Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B720

CPU

GPU

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Celeron B720

1 Cores1 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B720 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1047UE

2 / 2

675

+1.5%

665

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B720 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B720: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Celeron B720

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (665 vs 675).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1047UE better than Celeron B720?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron B720 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1047UE pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Celeron 1047UE also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1047UE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1047UE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron 1047UE comes in 42.9% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.5% better PassMark. Celeron B720 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 40.7% better value on paper (9.5 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on G2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1047UE vs Celeron B720 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron B720 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Celeron B720. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron B720 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Celeron B720's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B720
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.7 GHz+21%
Base Clock	—	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+33%	1.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	675+2%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	159	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	293	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron B720 uses G2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B720 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B720).

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B720
Socket	BGA1023	G2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B720) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B720
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Celeron B720 came in at $70. On launch pricing ($100 vs $70), Celeron B720 was $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Celeron B720 — making the Celeron B720 the 33.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1047UE	Celeron B720
MSRP	$100	$70-30%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	9.5+40%
Release Date	2013	2012

Search Celeron 1047UE on Amazon

Search Celeron B720 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.