Atom D2550 vs Celeron 1047UE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron 1047UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron 1047UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2550

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 512W, a 502W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron 1047UE

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D2550 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (675 vs 715).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Atom D2550 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5020% higher power demand at 512W vs 10W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2550 better than Celeron 1047UE?

Yes. Atom D2550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D2550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2550 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom D2550 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 1047UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 7.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1047UE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron 1047UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2550

The Atom D2550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron 1047UE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2550 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Atom D2550. The Atom D2550 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2550 scores 715 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 5.8% lead for the Atom D2550. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2550 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.

Feature	Atom D2550	Celeron 1047UE
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz+34%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	715+6%	675
Geekbench 6 Single	—	159
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	293

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2550 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2550 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE — the Celeron 1047UE supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2550) vs 2 (Celeron 1047UE). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom D2550) vs 16 (Celeron 1047UE) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2550) and BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE).

Feature	Atom D2550	Celeron 1047UE
Socket	FCBGA559	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2550) / VT-x (Celeron 1047UE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2550) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.