Atom D2550 vs Atom D2560

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2550 vs Atom D2560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2550 vs Atom D2560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2550

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Atom D2560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 765).
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Atom D2560

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D2560 better than Atom D2550?

Yes. Atom D2560 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom D2560 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D2560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D2560 still makes the most sense overall. Atom D2560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D2560 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2550 vs Atom D2560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2550

The Atom D2550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom D2560

The Atom D2560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom D2550 and Atom D2560 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2550 versus 2 GHz on the Atom D2560 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Atom D2560 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Atom D2550 scores 715 against the Atom D2560's 765 — a 6.8% lead for the Atom D2560. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2550 vs 1 MB on the Atom D2560.

Feature	Atom D2550	Atom D2560
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark	715	765+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA559 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2550) and Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2560).

Feature	Atom D2550	Atom D2560
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2550) and Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2560) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.