Atom D2550 vs Core 2 Duo L7400

Intel

Atom D2550

2 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.87 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo L7400

2 Cores17 WW2006
Similar parts
·······

Atom D2550 vs Core 2 Duo L7400 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2550 vs Core 2 Duo L7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2550 vs Core 2 Duo L7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2550

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 10W instead of 17W, a 7W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Core 2 Duo L7400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo L7400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (715 vs 765).

Core 2 Duo L7400

2006

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 70% higher power demand at 17W vs 10W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom D2550 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo L7400 better than Atom D2550?
Yes. Core 2 Duo L7400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo L7400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo L7400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 7% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Duo L7400 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo L7400 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom D2550 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom D2550 vs Core 2 Duo L7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom D2550

The Atom D2550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo L7400

The Core 2 Duo L7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Atom D2550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo L7400's 2 cores. The Atom D2550 is built on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom D2550 scores 715 against the Core 2 Duo L7400's 765 — a 6.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo L7400. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D2550 vs 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7400.

FeatureAtom D2550Core 2 Duo L7400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2
Boost Clock
1.87 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz+24%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Cedarview (2011−2012)
PassMark
715
765+7%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2550 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo L7400 uses BGA479 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom D2550Core 2 Duo L7400
Socket
FCBGA559
BGA479
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom D2550 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Core 2 Duo L7400 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom D2550Core 2 Duo L7400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3650