Atom D2550 vs E1-2200

Atom D2550 vs E1-2200 Performance Spectrum

Atom D2550

2 / 4

715

0.0%

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

802

+12.2%

Athlon XP 3200+

Athlon 64 3300+

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Athlon 64 FX-55

Ryzen 7 4700G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2550 vs E1-2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2550 vs E1-2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2550

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while E1-2200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than E1-2200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 802).

E1-2200

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 9W instead of 10W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D2550 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-2200 better than Atom D2550?

Yes. E1-2200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 12.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E1-2200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-2200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-2200 still makes the most sense overall. E1-2200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-2200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2550 vs E1-2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2550

The Atom D2550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

E1-2200

The E1-2200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.05 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 802 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the E1-2200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2550 versus 1.05 GHz on the E1-2200 — a 56.2% clock advantage for the Atom D2550. The Atom D2550 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the E1-2200 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2550 scores 715 against the E1-2200's 802 — a 11.5% lead for the E1-2200.

Feature	Atom D2550	E1-2200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz+78%	1.05 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1024 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	715	802+12%