Atom D2550 vs Celeron N3010

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron N3010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron N3010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom D2550

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (715 vs 735).
❌150% higher power demand at 10W vs 4W.

Celeron N3010

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 10W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Atom D2550 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3010 better than Atom D2550?

Yes. Celeron N3010 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3010 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3010 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3010 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3010 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom D2550 vs Celeron N3010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D2550

The Atom D2550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N3010

The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom D2550 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron N3010's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom D2550 versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 — a 18% clock advantage for the Celeron N3010 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.04 GHz). The Atom D2550 uses the Cedarview (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3010 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D2550 scores 715 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 2.8% lead for the Celeron N3010. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom D2550	Celeron N3010
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.24 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz+79%	1.04 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Cedarview (2011−2012)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	715	735+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom D2550 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom D2550 versus 1600 on the Celeron N3010 — the Celeron N3010 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N3010 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D2550) vs 2 (Celeron N3010). Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA559 (Atom D2550) and Braswell (Celeron N3010).

Feature	Atom D2550	Celeron N3010
Socket	FCBGA559	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom D2550) / true (Celeron N3010). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3650 (Atom D2550) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3010) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile.