
Celeron 1047UE

Pentium T2330
Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium T2330 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1047UE
2013Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 4.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium T2330 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (159 vs 223).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (293 vs 402).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
Pentium T2330
2007Why buy it
- ✅+40.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1047UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium T2330 better than Celeron 1047UE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium T2330
The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 1047UE is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 223, a 33.5% lead for the Pentium T2330 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 402 (31.4% advantage for the Pentium T2330). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 675+2% | 665 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 159 | 223+40% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 293 | 402+37% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+200% | DDR2-533 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs No (Pentium T2330). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2330 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | No |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1047UE was priced at $100, while the Pentium T2330 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($100 vs $150), Celeron 1047UE was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 4.4 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Celeron 1047UE the 41.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1047UE | Pentium T2330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8+55% | 4.4 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














