Celeron 1047UE
VS
Pentium T2330

Celeron 1047UE vs Pentium T2330

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the Pentium T2330 is on rank 1220, so the Celeron 1047UE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium T2330

#1208
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6623%
#1209
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6526%
#1210
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5991%
#1211
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5964%
#1212
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5909%
#1214
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5707%
#1215
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5472%
#1216
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5463%
#1217
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5316%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
100%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
94%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
92%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
92%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
91%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
91%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
88%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
85%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
75%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
63%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
53%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 1047UE (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($7)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium T2330 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1307%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($7)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and Pentium T2330

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Intel

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1047UE is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 159 vs 223, a 33.5% lead for the Pentium T2330 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 293 vs 402 (31.4% advantage for the Pentium T2330). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
675+2%
665
Geekbench 6 Single
159
223+40%
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
402+37%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 4 (Pentium T2330) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
Socket
BGA1023
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+50%
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) vs No (Pentium T2330). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium T2330 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
No
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the Pentium T2330 debuted at $150. At current prices ($100 vs $7), the Pentium T2330 is $93 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 95.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T2330 — making the Pentium T2330 the 173.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEPentium T2330
MSRP
$100-33%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$7-93%
Performance per Dollar
6.8
95.0+1297%
Release Date
2013
2007