Celeron 1047UE
VS
Athlon 64 FX-55

Celeron 1047UE vs Athlon 64 FX-55

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-55

1 Cores1 Thrd104 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1047UE is positioned at rank 1170 and the Athlon 64 FX-55 is on rank 1134, so the Athlon 64 FX-55 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-55

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
375560%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
354867%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
257663%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
77623%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
61486%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
53788%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
30807%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
30405%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
27684%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
27682%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
27372%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
26634%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
26261%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
26155%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
25918%
#1134
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
100%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
98%
#1136
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
89%
#1137
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
84%
#1138
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
83%
#1139
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
76%
#1140
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
69%
#1141
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
48%
#1142
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
22%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 1047UE (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clawhammer (2001−2005) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-55 (2004) relies on 130 nm technology and **DDR1 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+104%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1047UE and Athlon 64 FX-55

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-55

The Athlon 64 FX-55 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the Clawhammer (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Memory support: DDR1 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1047UE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-55 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-55 — a 60% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-55. The Celeron 1047UE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-55 uses Clawhammer (2001−2005) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1047UE scores 675 against the Athlon 64 FX-55's 690 — a 2.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-55. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-55.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
2.6 GHz+86%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-83%
130 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Clawhammer (2001−2005)
PassMark
675
690+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
159
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1047UE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-55 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1047UE versus DDR1-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-55 — the Celeron 1047UE supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1047UE supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1047UE) vs 0 (Athlon 64 FX-55) — the Celeron 1047UE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE) and nForce3,nForce4,Xpress 200 (Athlon 64 FX-55).

FeatureCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
Socket
BGA1023
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600+200%
DDR1-400
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1047UE) / not specified (Athlon 64 FX-55). The Celeron 1047UE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 FX-55 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 1047UE launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 FX-55 debuted at $827. At current prices ($100 vs $50), the Athlon 64 FX-55 is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1047UE delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 13.8 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 FX-55 — making the Athlon 64 FX-55 the 68.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 1047UEAthlon 64 FX-55
MSRP
$100-88%
$827
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$50-50%
Performance per Dollar
6.8
13.8+103%
Release Date
2013
2004