Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2370

Intel

Celeron N3000

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.08 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium T2370

35 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2370 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3000

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium T2370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (705 vs 745).

Pentium T2370

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron N3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T2370 better than Celeron N3000?
Yes. Pentium T2370 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium T2370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.7% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium T2370 is the better buy right now. Pentium T2370 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N3000

The Celeron N3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium T2370

The Pentium T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 745 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron N3000 is built on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N3000 scores 705 against the Pentium T2370's 745 — a 5.5% lead for the Pentium T2370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3000 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2370.

FeatureCeleron N3000Pentium T2370
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.08 GHz
Base Clock
1.04 GHz
1.73 GHz+66%
L3 Cache
0 kB
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark
705
745+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
160
Geekbench 6 Multi
290
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3000 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N3000Pentium T2370
Socket
FCBGA1170
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron N3000) / not specified (Pentium T2370). The Celeron N3000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3000 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N3000 rivals AMD E2-7110.

FeatureCeleron N3000Pentium T2370
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget Laptop