Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2330

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3000

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium T2330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (290 vs 402).

Pentium T2330

2007

Why buy it

✅+38.6% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N3000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N3000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3000 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3000 better than Pentium T2330?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3000 is ahead with a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2330 pulls ahead with 38.6% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T2330 is the stronger fit. You are getting 38.6% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T2330 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (4.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3000 vs Pentium T2330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3000

The Celeron N3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium T2330

The Pentium T2330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3000 is built on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N3000 scores 705 against the Pentium T2330's 665 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron N3000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 160 vs 223, a 32.9% lead for the Pentium T2330 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 290 vs 402 (32.4% advantage for the Pentium T2330). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3000 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2330.

Feature	Celeron N3000	Pentium T2330
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.08 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.04 GHz	1.6 GHz+54%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	705+6%	665
Geekbench 6 Single	160	223+39%
Geekbench 6 Multi	290	402+39%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3000 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T2330 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron N3000 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium T2330 — the Celeron N3000 supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron N3000 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3000) and GL960 (Pentium T2330).

Feature	Celeron N3000	Pentium T2330
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+200%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron N3000) vs No (Pentium T2330). The Celeron N3000 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium T2330 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3000 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N3000 rivals AMD E2-7110.