Celeron N3150 vs Celeron 3755U

The Celeron N3150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 3755U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N3150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3150 versus 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3755U — a 20.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3150 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N3150 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron 3755U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3150 scores 1,177 against the Celeron 3755U's 1,182 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 3755U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3150 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3755U.

The Celeron N3150 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron 3755U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3150 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3755U — the Celeron N3150 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3755U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3150) vs 12 (Celeron 3755U) — the Celeron 3755U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3150) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3755U).

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3150) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Celeron N3150) and HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3755U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron N3150 rivals AMD E2-7110; Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U.