Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 3850

Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 3850 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N3150

4 / 4

1,177

+0.8%

1,168

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 3850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 3850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3150

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), while Sempron 3850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Sempron 3850

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,168 vs 1,177).
❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3150 better than Sempron 3850?

Yes. Celeron N3150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3150 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N3150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3150 vs Sempron 3850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3150

The Celeron N3150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,177 points. Launch price was $107.

Sempron 3850

The Sempron 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3150 and Sempron 3850 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3150 versus 1.3 GHz on the Sempron 3850 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Celeron N3150. The Celeron N3150 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Sempron 3850 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3150 scores 1,177 against the Sempron 3850's 1,168 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron N3150.

Feature	Celeron N3150	Sempron 3850
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.08 GHz+60%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB	2048 kB
Process	14 nm-50%	28 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,177	1,168

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3150 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Sempron 3850 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3150	Sempron 3850
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3150) / not specified (Sempron 3850). The Celeron N3150 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)), while the Sempron 3850 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3150 rivals AMD E2-7110.