Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron N3160

4 / 4

1,195

0.0%

22,430

+1777.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3160

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,195 vs 22,430).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +743.2% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Celeron N3160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3160 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron N3160?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 743.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1777% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 743.2% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1777% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 743.2% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3160

The Celeron N3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3160 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 65.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron N3160 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3160 scores 1,195 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 179.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3160 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron N3160	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	2.24 GHz	4.4 GHz+96%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+125%
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,195	22,430+1777%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3160 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3160) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3160) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Celeron N3160	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR4-3200+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	24+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3160) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron N3160 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3160 rivals AMD E2-9010.