Celeron N4000 vs Core Duo T2400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4000 vs Core Duo T2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4000 vs Core Duo T2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4000

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 171.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,472 vs 1,488).
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2400

2006

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000 better than Core Duo T2400?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N4000 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2400 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000 is the better buy right now. Celeron N4000 comes in $187 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core Duo T2400 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 171.8% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 5.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N4000 vs Core Duo T2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4000

The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

Core Duo T2400

The Core Duo T2400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,488 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4000 and Core Duo T2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Duo T2400 — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Duo T2400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Core Duo T2400's 1,488 — a 1.1% lead for the Core Duo T2400. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2400.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Core Duo T2400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+42%	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.83 GHz+66%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,472	1,488+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Core Duo T2400
Socket	FCBGA1090	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	—	4 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000) / VT-x (Core Duo T2400). Primary use case: Core Duo T2400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Duo T2400 rivals Pentium T2310.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Core Duo T2400
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N4000 was priced at $107, while the Core Duo T2400 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($107 vs $294), Celeron N4000 was $187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N4000 delivers 13.8 pts/$ vs 5.1 pts/$ for the Core Duo T2400 — making the Celeron N4000 the 92.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Core Duo T2400
MSRP	$107-64%	$294
Performance per Dollar	13.8+171%	5.1
Release Date	2017	2006

Search Celeron N4000 on Amazon

Search Core Duo T2400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.