Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM

Intel

Celeron N4000

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4000

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $193 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 182.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-620LM

2010

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron N4000 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,463 vs 1,472).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
  • 316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000 better than Core i7-620LM?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-620LM is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron N4000 is the better buy right now. Celeron N4000 comes in $193 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-620LM is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 182.1% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 4.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N4000

The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N4000. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM.

FeatureCeleron N4000Core i7-620LM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2 GHz+82%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont Plus (2017)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,472
1,463
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4000Core i7-620LM
Socket
FCBGA1090
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron N4000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureCeleron N4000Core i7-620LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N4000 was priced at $107, while the Core i7-620LM came in at $300. On launch pricing ($107 vs $300), Celeron N4000 was $193 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N4000 delivers 13.8 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-620LM — making the Celeron N4000 the 95.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron N4000Core i7-620LM
MSRP
$107-64%
$300
Performance per Dollar
13.8+182%
4.9
Release Date
2017
2010

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.