
Celeron N4000

Core i7-620LM
Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $193 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 4.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 25W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-620LM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-620LM
2010Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron N4000 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,463 vs 1,472).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 6W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N4000 better than Core i7-620LM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N4000 vs Core i7-620LM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4000
The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i7-620LM
The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.
Processing Power
The Celeron N4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-620LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-620LM (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-620LM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Core i7-620LM's 1,463 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron N4000. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Core i7-620LM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 2 GHz+82% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,472 | 1,463 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 450 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 900 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-620LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Core i7-620LM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-620LM). The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron N4000 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Core i7-620LM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N4000 was priced at $107, while the Core i7-620LM came in at $300. On launch pricing ($107 vs $300), Celeron N4000 was $193 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N4000 delivers 13.8 pts/$ vs 4.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-620LM — making the Celeron N4000 the 95.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Core i7-620LM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-64% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.8+182% | 4.9 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














