Celeron N4000 vs Pentium M 735

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4000 vs Pentium M 735 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4000 vs Pentium M 735: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4000

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 177.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.8 vs 5.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 21W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium M 735

2004

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,459 vs 1,472).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌250% higher power demand at 21W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000 better than Pentium M 735?

Yes. Celeron N4000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000 is the better buy right now. Celeron N4000 comes in $187 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 177.2% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 5.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2004) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4000 vs Pentium M 735 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4000

The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium M 735

The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N4000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron N4000. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Pentium M 735
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+53%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.7 GHz+55%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-84%	90 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,472	1,459

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Pentium M 735
Socket	FCBGA1090	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR-333
Max RAM Capacity	—	2 GB
RAM Channels	—	1
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000) / None (Pentium M 735). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Pentium M 735
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	None
Target Use	—	Mobile Legacy

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N4000 was priced at $107, while the Pentium M 735 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($107 vs $294), Celeron N4000 was $187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N4000 delivers 13.8 pts/$ vs 5.0 pts/$ for the Pentium M 735 — making the Celeron N4000 the 94% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Pentium M 735
MSRP	$107-64%	$294
Performance per Dollar	13.8+176%	5.0
Release Date	2017	2004

Search Celeron N4000 on Amazon

Search Pentium M 735 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.