Celeron N4000 vs Pentium M 735
Celeron N4000
Pentium M 735
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4000 is positioned at rank 126 and the Pentium M 735 is on rank 1207, so the Celeron N4000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4000
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 735
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+889%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($294) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4000 and Pentium M 735
Celeron N4000
The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.
Pentium M 735
The Pentium M 735 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,459 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron N4000 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 735 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron N4000 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium M 735 — a 41.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium M 735 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Pentium M 735's 1,459 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron N4000. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4000 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 735.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+53% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz+55% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-84% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| PassMark | 1,472 | 1,459 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium M 735 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR-333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4000) / None (Pentium M 735). Primary use case: Pentium M 735 targets Mobile Legacy.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Mobile Legacy |
Value Analysis
The Celeron N4000 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Pentium M 735 debuted at $294.
| Feature | Celeron N4000 | Pentium M 735 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-64% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2004 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron N4000 and Pentium M 735
