Celeron N4000 vs Turion II P560

Celeron N4000 vs Turion II P560 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N4000

2 / 2

1,472

+1.2%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,455

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4000 vs Turion II P560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4000 vs Turion II P560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4000

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Turion II P560 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 6W vs 2W.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,455 vs 1,472).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4000 better than Turion II P560?

Yes. Celeron N4000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4000 is the better buy right now. Celeron N4000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $107 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4000 vs Turion II P560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4000

The Celeron N4000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,472 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4000 and Turion II P560 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron N4000 versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II P560 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4000. The Celeron N4000 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II P560 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4000 scores 1,472 against the Turion II P560's 1,455 — a 1.2% lead for the Celeron N4000.

Feature	Celeron N4000	Turion II P560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+4%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,472+1%	1,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4000 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II P560 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.