Celeron N4020 vs Celeron N4020C

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4020 vs Celeron N4020C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4020 vs Celeron N4020C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4020

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 6W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,535 vs 1,537).

Celeron N4020C

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌50% higher power demand at 6W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4020C better than Celeron N4020?

Yes. Celeron N4020C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.1% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4020C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4020C still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4020C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4020 vs Celeron N4020C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4020

The Celeron N4020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,535 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4020 and Celeron N4020C share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron N4020 is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4020 scores 1,535 against the Celeron N4020C's 1,537 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N4020C. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N4020	Celeron N4020C
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	—
PassMark	1,535	1,537