Celeron N4020 vs Core Duo T2250

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4020 vs Core Duo T2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4020 vs Core Duo T2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4020

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,535 vs 1,537).
❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2250 better than Celeron N4020?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N4020 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2250 still makes the most sense overall. Core Duo T2250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N4020 vs Core Duo T2250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4020

The Celeron N4020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,535 points. Launch price was $69.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N4020 and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020 versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 48.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4020 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron N4020 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4020 scores 1,535 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.1% lead for the Core Duo T2250. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4020 vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250.

Feature	Celeron N4020	Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+65%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.73 GHz+57%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,535	1,537

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4020 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.