Celeron N4020C vs Core i5-4210Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4020C vs Core i5-4210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4020C vs Core i5-4210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4020C

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-4210Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4200, while Celeron N4020C needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,530 vs 1,537).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N4020C better than Core i5-4210Y?

Yes. Celeron N4020C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N4020C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N4020C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N4020C still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N4020C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N4020C vs Core i5-4210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4210Y

The Core i5-4210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4020C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4210Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4210Y — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Celeron N4020C (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i5-4210Y is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4020C scores 1,537 against the Core i5-4210Y's 1,530 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N4020C. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4020C vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210Y.

Feature	Celeron N4020C	Core i5-4210Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+47%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.5 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,537	1,530
Geekbench 6 Single	—	580

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4020C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-4210Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N4020C	Core i5-4210Y
Socket	FCBGA1090	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4020C) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210Y). The Core i5-4210Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4200), while the Celeron N4020C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210Y rivals A4-6210.