A10-6790B vs Celeron N4020C

A10-6790B vs Celeron N4020C Performance Spectrum

A10-6790B

4 / 4

1,546

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4020C

2 / 2

1,537

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6790B vs Celeron N4020C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6790B vs Celeron N4020C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6790B

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Celeron N4020C needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N4020C.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Celeron N4020C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 6W.

Celeron N4020C

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 100W, a 94W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6790B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,546).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6790B better than Celeron N4020C?

Yes. A10-6790B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6790B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6790B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6790B is the better buy right now. A10-6790B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $122 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6790B vs Celeron N4020C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790B

The A10-6790B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6790B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4020C offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-6790B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790B versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C — a 42.3% clock advantage for the A10-6790B (base: 4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10-6790B is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A10-6790B scores 1,546 against the Celeron N4020C's 1,537 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-6790B.

Feature	A10-6790B	Celeron N4020C
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+54%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+264%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB	—
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	1,546	1,537

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6790B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4020C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6790B	Celeron N4020C
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790B) / not specified (Celeron N4020C). The A10-6790B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Celeron N4020C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-6790B rivals Core i3-4330.