A9-9410 vs Celeron N4020C

A9-9410 vs Celeron N4020C Performance Spectrum

A9-9410

2 / 2

1,550

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4020C

2 / 2

1,537

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A9-9410 vs Celeron N4020C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A9-9410 vs Celeron N4020C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A9-9410

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5, while Celeron N4020C needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N4020C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌150% higher power demand at 15W vs 6W.

Celeron N4020C

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 15W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,537 vs 1,550).
❌No integrated graphics, while A9-9410 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A9-9410 better than Celeron N4020C?

Yes. A9-9410 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A9-9410 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A9-9410 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A9-9410 is the better buy right now. A9-9410 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4020C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A9-9410 vs Celeron N4020C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A9-9410

The A9-9410 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A9-9410 and Celeron N4020C share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A9-9410 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A9-9410 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A9-9410 is built on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the A9-9410 scores 1,550 against the Celeron N4020C's 1,537 — a 0.8% lead for the A9-9410. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A9-9410 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N4020C.

Feature	A9-9410	Celeron N4020C
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+164%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	—
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	1,550	1,537
Geekbench 6 Single	350	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	650	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A9-9410 uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4020C uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A9-9410	Celeron N4020C
Socket	FP4	FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A9-9410) / not specified (Celeron N4020C). The A9-9410 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5), while the Celeron N4020C requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A9-9410 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A9-9410 rivals Pentium N4200.