Celeron N4020C
VS
Core i7-640LM

Celeron N4020C vs Core i7-640LM

Intel

Celeron N4020C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i7-640LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N4020C is positioned at rank 575 and the Core i7-640LM is on rank 333, so the Core i7-640LM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N4020C

#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
100%
#563
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
763%
#564
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
752%
#565
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
691%
#566
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
687%
#567
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
681%
#569
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
658%
#570
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
631%
#571
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
630%
#572
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
613%
#575
Celeron N4020C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640LM

#321
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
480%
#322
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
473%
#323
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
434%
#324
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
432%
#325
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
428%
#327
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
413%
#328
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
396%
#329
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
396%
#330
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
385%
#333
Core i7-640LM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4020C (2021) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N4020CCore i7-640LM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-640LM (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N4020CCore i7-640LM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4020C and Core i7-640LM

Intel

Celeron N4020C

The Celeron N4020C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-640LM

The Core i7-640LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,529 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

The Celeron N4020C packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-640LM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4020C versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-640LM — a 4.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-640LM (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core i7-640LM is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4020C scores 1,537 against the Core i7-640LM's 1,529 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N4020C. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4020C vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640LM.

FeatureCeleron N4020CCore i7-640LM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
2.93 GHz+5%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
2.13 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,537
1,529
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4020C uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-640LM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N4020CCore i7-640LM
Socket
FCBGA1090
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4020C) / true (Core i7-640LM). The Core i7-640LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Celeron N4020C requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-640LM rivals Core 2 Duo SL9400.

FeatureCeleron N4020CCore i7-640LM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true