Celeron N4120 vs Xeon L7455

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N4120 vs Xeon L7455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N4120 vs Xeon L7455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N4120

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L7455 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,463 vs 2,494).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).

Xeon L7455

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L7455 better than Celeron N4120?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L7455 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N4120 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L7455 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L7455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L7455 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon L7455 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4120 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N4120 vs Xeon L7455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N4120

The Celeron N4120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon L7455

The Xeon L7455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,494 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4120 is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N4120 scores 2,463 against the Xeon L7455's 2,494 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon L7455. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N4120 vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon L7455.

Feature	Celeron N4120	Xeon L7455
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.13 GHz+94%
L3 Cache	4 MB	12 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	—
PassMark	2,463	2,494+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4120 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L7455 uses PGA604 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.