Celeron N5095A
VS
Core i3-7130U

Celeron N5095A vs Core i3-7130U

Intel

Celeron N5095A

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
VS
Intel

Core i3-7130U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7130U

#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
100%
#629
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
868%
#630
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
856%
#631
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
785%
#632
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
782%
#633
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
775%
#635
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
748%
#636
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
717%
#637
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
716%
#638
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
697%
#641
Core i3-7130U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N5095A leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-7130U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N5095ACore i3-7130U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N5095ACore i3-7130U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5095A and Core i3-7130U

Intel

Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,054 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-7130U

The Core i3-7130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,055 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095A packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7130U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095A has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095A versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-7130U — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N5095A (base: 2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron N5095A uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7130U uses Kaby Lake-U (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095A scores 4,054 against the Core i3-7130U's 4,055 — a 0% lead for the Core i3-7130U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095A vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7130U.

FeatureCeleron N5095ACore i3-7130U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+7%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+200%
512 kB
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark
4,054
4,055
Geekbench 6 Single
900
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095A uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7130U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5095ACore i3-7130U
Socket
BGA1338
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095A) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7130U). The Core i3-7130U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 620), while the Celeron N5095A requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7130U rivals Ryzen 3 3250U.

FeatureCeleron N5095ACore i3-7130U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 620
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop