Celeron N5095A vs Core i3-8145UE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5095A vs Core i3-8145UE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5095A vs Core i3-8145UE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5095A

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-8145UE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-8145UE

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 620, while Celeron N5095A needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,021 vs 4,054).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Celeron N5095A mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌900% higher power demand at 15W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5095A better than Core i3-8145UE?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-8145UE is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5095A pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5095A is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5095A is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N5095A comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Core i3-8145UE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.8% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5095A makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5095A vs Core i3-8145UE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,054 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-8145UE

The Core i3-8145UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,021 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095A packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-8145UE offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095A has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095A versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-8145UE — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-8145UE (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron N5095A uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-8145UE uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095A scores 4,054 against the Core i3-8145UE's 4,021 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron N5095A. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095A vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-8145UE.

Feature	Celeron N5095A	Core i3-8145UE
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark	4,054	4,021
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	2,356
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,218
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,356

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095A uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-8145UE uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5095A	Core i3-8145UE
Socket	BGA1338	FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095A) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8145UE). The Core i3-8145UE includes integrated graphics (UHD 620), while the Celeron N5095A requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8145UE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-8145UE rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.