Athlon PRO 300U
VS
Celeron N5095A

Athlon PRO 300U vs Celeron N5095A

AMD

Athlon PRO 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Celeron N5095A

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon PRO 300U is positioned at rank #1006 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 300U

#994
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2157%
#995
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2126%
#996
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1951%
#997
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1943%
#998
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1925%
#1000
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1859%
#1001
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1782%
#1002
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1779%
#1003
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1732%
#1006
Athlon PRO 300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
100%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
100%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
99%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
98%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
97%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
96%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
96%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
95%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
94%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon PRO 300U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N5095A in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon PRO 300UCeleron N5095A
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon PRO 300UCeleron N5095A
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon PRO 300U and Celeron N5095A

AMD

Athlon PRO 300U

The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,054 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N5095A offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095A has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095A — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 300U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon PRO 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N5095A uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300U scores 4,080 against the Celeron N5095A's 4,054 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon PRO 300U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 300U vs 4 MB on the Celeron N5095A.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCeleron N5095A
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+14%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
1.5 MB+200%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
4,080
4,054
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N5095A uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCeleron N5095A
Socket
FP5
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

The Athlon PRO 300U includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Celeron N5095A requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCeleron N5095A
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon Vega 3