Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i5-10210Y

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i5-10210Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon PRO 300U

2 / 4

4,080

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-10210Y

4 / 8

4,131

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i5-10210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i5-10210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10210Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,080 vs 4,131).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Core i5-10210Y

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-10210Y better than Athlon PRO 300U?

Yes. Core i5-10210Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-10210Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-10210Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-10210Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-10210Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-10210Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i5-10210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300U

The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10210Y

The Core i5-10210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-Y (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1377. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,131 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10210Y offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10210Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U versus 4 GHz on the Core i5-10210Y — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10210Y (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Athlon PRO 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10210Y uses Comet Lake-Y (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300U scores 4,080 against the Core i5-10210Y's 4,131 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i5-10210Y. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 300U vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-10210Y.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300U	Core i5-10210Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	4 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+140%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Raven Ridge 2 (2019)	Comet Lake-Y (2019)
PassMark	4,080	4,131+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,079
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,380

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon PRO 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10210Y uses UTFCBGA1377 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 300U versus LPDDR3 2133 MHz on the Core i5-10210Y — the Athlon PRO 300U supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon PRO 300U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 300U) vs 10 (Core i5-10210Y) — the Core i5-10210Y offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 300U) and SoC (Core i5-10210Y).

Feature	Athlon PRO 300U	Core i5-10210Y
Socket	FP5	UTFCBGA1377
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+13%	LPDDR3 2133 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	8	10+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 300U) / true (Core i5-10210Y). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon PRO 300U) and Intel UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-10210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10210Y targets Mobile Low Power.