Athlon PRO 300U vs FX-6200
Athlon PRO 300U
FX-6200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon PRO 300U is positioned at rank 1006 and the FX-6200 is on rank 701, so the FX-6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon PRO 300U
Performance Per Dollar FX-6200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon PRO 300U | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon PRO 300U | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($25) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon PRO 300U and FX-6200
Athlon PRO 300U
The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.
FX-6200
The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-6200 offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the FX-6200 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 — a 21.6% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon PRO 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-6200 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300U scores 4,080 against the FX-6200's 4,114 — a 0.8% lead for the FX-6200. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 300U vs 8192 kB on the FX-6200.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300U | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 6+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+24% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 8192 kB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6144 kB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Raven Ridge 2 (2019) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,080 | 4,114 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-6200 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300U | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | — |
Advanced Features
The Athlon PRO 300U includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the FX-6200 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 300U | FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon PRO 300U and FX-6200
