Athlon PRO 300U vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

Athlon PRO 300U vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Performance Spectrum

Athlon PRO 300U

2 / 4

4,080

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

8 / 8

4,125

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300U vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300U vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300U

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while MediaTek Kompanio 1300T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,080 vs 4,125).

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 300U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is MediaTek Kompanio 1300T better than Athlon PRO 300U?

Yes. MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 17.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T still makes the most sense overall. MediaTek Kompanio 1300T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon PRO 300U vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 300U

The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

The MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in 9 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. Built on 6 nm process technology. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,125 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon PRO 300U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U versus 2.6 GHz on the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T — a 23.7% clock advantage for the Athlon PRO 300U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon PRO 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T uses Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300U scores 4,080 against the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T's 4,125 — a 1.1% lead for the MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.

Feature	Athlon PRO 300U	MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+27%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+20%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Raven Ridge 2 (2019)	Cortex-A78 / A55 (2022−2024)
PassMark	4,080	4,125+1%