Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i7-7567U

AMD

Athlon PRO 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-7567U

2 Cores4 Thrd28 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i7-7567U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i7-7567U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i7-7567U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon PRO 300U

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 28W, a 13W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i7-7567U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,080 vs 4,095).

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 86.7% higher power demand at 28W vs 15W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 300U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-7567U better than Athlon PRO 300U?
    Yes. Core i7-7567U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7567U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7567U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-7567U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon PRO 300U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon PRO 300U vs Core i7-7567U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon PRO 300U

    The Athlon PRO 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,080 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Core i7-7567U

    The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon PRO 300U and Core i7-7567U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon PRO 300U versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Athlon PRO 300U uses the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-7567U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 300U scores 4,080 against the Core i7-7567U's 4,095 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-7567U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 300U vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U.

    FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCore i7-7567U
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.3 GHz
    4 GHz+21%
    Base Clock
    2.4 GHz
    3.5 GHz+46%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    4 MB
    L2 Cache
    512K (per core)
    512 kB
    Process
    14 nm
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
    Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
    PassMark
    4,080
    4,095
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon PRO 300U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-7567U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCore i7-7567U
    Socket
    FP5
    BGA1356
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2400
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    8
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Athlon PRO 300U includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i7-7567U requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAthlon PRO 300UCore i7-7567U
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    AMD Radeon Vega 3