Celeron N6211
VS
Celeron G3930

Celeron N6211 vs Celeron G3930

Intel

Celeron N6211

2 Cores2 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 3 GHz2022
VS
Intel

Celeron G3930

2 Cores2 Thrd51 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3930

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5795%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5476%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3976%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1198%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
949%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
830%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
469%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
427%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
427%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
422%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
411%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
405%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
404%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
400%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
97%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
100%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
100%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
98%
#410
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N6211 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G3930 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N6211Celeron G3930
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Elkhart Lake (2022) / 10 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N6211Celeron G3930
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N6211 and Celeron G3930

Intel

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

Intel

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N6211 and Celeron G3930 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N6211 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron N6211 uses the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron G3930 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N6211 scores 2,245 against the Celeron G3930's 2,259 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3930.

FeatureCeleron N6211Celeron G3930
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
2.9 GHz+142%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
256K (per core)
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Elkhart Lake (2022)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
2,245
2,259
Geekbench 6 Single
750
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N6211 uses the BGA1493 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron G3930 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N6211Celeron G3930
Socket
BGA1493
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N6211) / VT-x (Celeron G3930). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Celeron N6211 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureCeleron N6211Celeron G3930
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget