Celeron N6211 vs Core i7-3555LE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N6211 vs Core i7-3555LE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N6211 vs Core i7-3555LE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-3555LE

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N6211 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,238 vs 2,245).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Celeron N6211 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1566.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N6211 better than Core i7-3555LE?

Yes. Celeron N6211 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N6211 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N6211 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N6211 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N6211 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-3555LE only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N6211 vs Core i7-3555LE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

Core i7-3555LE

The Core i7-3555LE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,238 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N6211 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3555LE's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-3555LE — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3555LE (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron N6211 uses the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-3555LE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N6211 scores 2,245 against the Core i7-3555LE's 2,238 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N6211.

Feature	Celeron N6211	Core i7-3555LE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.2 GHz+7%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+108%
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Elkhart Lake (2022)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,245	2,238

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N6211 uses the BGA1493 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-3555LE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.