Celeron J3455 vs Celeron N6211

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455 vs Celeron N6211 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455 vs Celeron N6211: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Celeron N6211 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌566.7% higher power demand at 10W vs 1.5W.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,247).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N6211 better than Celeron J3455?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N6211 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N6211 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N6211 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3455 vs Celeron N6211 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455

The Celeron J3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,247 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N6211 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455 versus 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N6211 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron J3455 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N6211 uses Elkhart Lake (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3455 scores 2,247 against the Celeron N6211's 2,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455.

Feature	Celeron J3455	Celeron N6211
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz+25%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
PassMark	2,247	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3455 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N6211 uses BGA1493 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J3455	Celeron N6211
Socket	FCBGA1296	BGA1493
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3455) / not specified (Celeron N6211). The Celeron J3455 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Celeron N6211 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455 rivals Pentium J4205.