Celeron J3455 vs Pentium P6100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455 vs Pentium P6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455 vs Pentium P6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 500, while Pentium P6100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium P6100

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron J3455 across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,247).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron J3455 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3455 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3455 better than Pentium P6100?

Yes. Celeron J3455 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J3455 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3455 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J3455 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6100 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3455 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J3455 vs Pentium P6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455

The Celeron J3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,247 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium P6100

The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J3455 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 14% clock advantage for the Celeron J3455 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron J3455 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3455 scores 2,247 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3455 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100.

Feature	Celeron J3455	Pentium P6100
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+15%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,247	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3455 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J3455	Pentium P6100
Socket	FCBGA1296	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J3455) / not specified (Pentium P6100). The Celeron J3455 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium P6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455 rivals Pentium J4205.