Celeron J3455 vs Core i5-8200Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J3455 vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J3455 vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J3455

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 10W vs 5W.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 10W, a 5W reduction.
✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron J3455 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,247).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J3455 better than Core i5-8200Y?

Yes. Celeron J3455 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J3455 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J3455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J3455 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron J3455 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J3455 vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J3455

The Celeron J3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,247 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J3455 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8200Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3455 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 51.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron J3455 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J3455 scores 2,247 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J3455. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 858, a 62.4% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron J3455 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.

Feature	Celeron J3455	Core i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.9 GHz+70%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz+15%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,247	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	450	858+91%
Geekbench 6 Multi	850	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J3455 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3455 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Celeron J3455 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-8200Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J3455) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Core i5-8200Y offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J3455) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

Feature	Celeron J3455	Core i5-8200Y
Socket	FCBGA1296	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	10+67%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J3455) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3455) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455 targets Low Power, Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455 rivals Pentium J4205; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.