A10-8700P vs Celeron N6211

A10-8700P vs Celeron N6211 Performance Spectrum

A10-8700P

4 / 4

2,254

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N6211

2 / 2

2,245

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-8700P vs Celeron N6211 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-8700P vs Celeron N6211: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-8700P

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Celeron N6211 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Celeron N6211 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 2W vs 1.5W.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,254).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-8700P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-8700P better than Celeron N6211?

Yes. A10-8700P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-8700P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-8700P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-8700P is the better buy right now. A10-8700P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-8700P vs Celeron N6211 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-8700P

The A10-8700P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,254 points. Launch price was $130.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-8700P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N6211 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-8700P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-8700P versus 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A10-8700P (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The A10-8700P uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron N6211 uses Elkhart Lake (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10-8700P scores 2,254 against the Celeron N6211's 2,245 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-8700P.

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron N6211
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz+50%	1.2 GHz
L2 Cache	2048 kB+33%	1.5 MB
Process	28 nm	10 nm-64%
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
PassMark	2,254	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	480	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-8700P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N6211 uses BGA1493 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-8700P	Celeron N6211
Socket	FP4	BGA1493
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-8700P) / not specified (Celeron N6211). The A10-8700P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Celeron N6211 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-8700P targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-8700P rivals Core i5-5200U.