Celeron G3930 vs Celeron N6211

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930 vs Celeron N6211 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930 vs Celeron N6211: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Celeron N6211 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Celeron N6211 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌3300% higher power demand at 51W vs 1.5W.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 51W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,259).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N6211 better than Celeron G3930?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N6211 is ahead with a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N6211 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N6211 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (53.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930 vs Celeron N6211 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930 and Celeron N6211 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 3 GHz on the Celeron N6211 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N6211 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N6211 uses Elkhart Lake (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Celeron N6211's 2,245 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3930.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Celeron N6211
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+142%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+16967%	1.5 MB
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
PassMark	2,259	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	750	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N6211 uses BGA1493 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Celeron N6211
Socket	LGA1151	BGA1493
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930) / not specified (Celeron N6211). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Celeron N6211 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.