Celeron N6211 vs Pentium 4417U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N6211 vs Pentium 4417U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N6211 vs Pentium 4417U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N6211

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,260).

Pentium 4417U

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N6211 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌900% higher power demand at 15W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N6211 better than Pentium 4417U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N6211 is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4417U pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4417U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N6211 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N6211 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N6211 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N6211 vs Pentium 4417U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N6211

The Celeron N6211 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 July 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1493. Thermal design power (TDP): 1.5 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $54.

Pentium 4417U

The Pentium 4417U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB SmartCache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,260 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N6211 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pentium 4417U's 2 cores. The Celeron N6211 uses the Elkhart Lake (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Pentium 4417U uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N6211 scores 2,245 against the Pentium 4417U's 2,260 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium 4417U.

Feature	Celeron N6211	Pentium 4417U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.3 GHz+92%
L3 Cache	—	2 MB SmartCache
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	—
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Elkhart Lake (2022)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	2,245	2,260

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N6211 uses the BGA1493 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Pentium 4417U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.