Celeron P4500 vs Celeron P4600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron P4500

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron P4600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (905 vs 965).

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron P4600 better than Celeron P4500?

Yes. Celeron P4600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron P4600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron P4600 is the better buy right now. Celeron P4600 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $86 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 6.6% better value on MSRP (11.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron P4600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron P4500

The Celeron P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron P4500 and Celeron P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Celeron P4500 versus 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Celeron P4600 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron P4500 scores 905 against the Celeron P4600's 965 — a 6.4% lead for the Celeron P4600. Both processors carry 2 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron P4500	Celeron P4600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.07 GHz	0.1 GHz+43%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Westmere (2010−2011)	Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark	905	965+7%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA988 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4500) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4600).

Feature	Celeron P4500	Celeron P4600
Socket	PGA988	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	1066
Max RAM Capacity	8	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron P4500) and Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron P4600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4500 rivals Pentium P6000; Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Celeron P4500	Celeron P4600
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron P4500 was priced at $86, while the Celeron P4600 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($86 vs $86), Celeron P4600 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4500 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 11.2 pts/$ for the Celeron P4600 — making the Celeron P4600 the 6.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron P4500	Celeron P4600
MSRP	$86	$86
Performance per Dollar	10.5	11.2+7%
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Celeron P4500 on Amazon

Search Celeron P4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.