
Celeron P4500

Celeron T3100
Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron P4500
2010Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Celeron T3100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (905 vs 945).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
Celeron T3100
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 44.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron T3100 better than Celeron P4500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron P4500
The Celeron P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T3100
The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron P4500 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron P4500 scores 905 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron T3100. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4500 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | 1.9 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | — |
| PassMark | 905 | 945+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4500 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron T3100 — the Celeron P4500 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron P4500) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the Celeron P4500 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4500) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100).
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+33% | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4500) vs None (Celeron T3100). The Celeron P4500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron P4500 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron P4500 was priced at $86, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($86 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4500 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 36.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $62-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5 | 15.2+45% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














