Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100

Intel

Celeron P4500

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron T3100

35 WW2008
Similar parts
·······

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron P4500

2010

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Celeron T3100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (905 vs 945).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Celeron T3100

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $24 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
  • Delivers 44.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3100 better than Celeron P4500?
Yes. Celeron T3100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron T3100 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3100 comes in $24 cheaper on MSRP at $62 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 44.8% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron P4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron P4500 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron P4500

The Celeron P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron P4500 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron P4500 scores 905 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron T3100. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4500 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.

FeatureCeleron P4500Celeron T3100
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
1.9 GHz+2%
L3 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark
905
945+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4500 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron T3100 — the Celeron P4500 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron P4500) vs 0 (Celeron T3100) — the Celeron P4500 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4500) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100).

FeatureCeleron P4500Celeron T3100
Socket
PGA988
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1066+33%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4500) vs None (Celeron T3100). The Celeron P4500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Celeron T3100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron P4500 rivals Pentium P6000.

FeatureCeleron P4500Celeron T3100
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron P4500 was priced at $86, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($86 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4500 delivers 10.5 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 36.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron P4500Celeron T3100
MSRP
$86
$62-28%
Performance per Dollar
10.5
15.2+45%
Release Date
2010
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.