Celeron P4500 vs VIA Nano X2 U4025
Celeron P4500
VIA Nano X2 U4025
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron P4500 is positioned at rank 1064 and the VIA Nano X2 U4025 is on rank 831, so the VIA Nano X2 U4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron P4500
Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano X2 U4025
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron P4500 | VIA Nano X2 U4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (CNC (2011) / 40 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron P4500 | VIA Nano X2 U4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron P4500 and VIA Nano X2 U4025
Celeron P4500
The Celeron P4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.
VIA Nano X2 U4025
The VIA Nano X2 U4025 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in Janeiro 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNC (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 885 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron P4500 and VIA Nano X2 U4025 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Celeron P4500 versus 1.2 GHz on the VIA Nano X2 U4025 — a 178% clock advantage for the VIA Nano X2 U4025. The Celeron P4500 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses CNC (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron P4500 scores 905 against the VIA Nano X2 U4025's 885 — a 2.2% lead for the Celeron P4500.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | VIA Nano X2 U4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.07 GHz | 1.2 GHz+1614% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-20% | 40 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | CNC (2011) |
| PassMark | 905+2% | 885 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron P4500 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | VIA Nano X2 U4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | NanoBGA2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron P4500) / not specified (VIA Nano X2 U4025). The Celeron P4500 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the VIA Nano X2 U4025 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4500 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | Celeron P4500 | VIA Nano X2 U4025 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron P4500 and VIA Nano X2 U4025
