Celeron T1600 vs Pentium SU4100

CPU

GPU

Celeron T1600

35 WW2008

Buy on Amazon

Pentium SU4100

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2009

Buy on Amazon

Celeron T1600 vs Pentium SU4100 Performance Spectrum

Celeron T1600

715

+4.4%

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

685

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T1600 vs Pentium SU4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T1600 vs Pentium SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T1600

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $182 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 181.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 2.4 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌250% higher power demand at 35W vs 10W.

Pentium SU4100

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 35W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T1600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (685 vs 715).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T1600 better than Pentium SU4100?

Yes. Celeron T1600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T1600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T1600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T1600 is the better buy right now. Celeron T1600 comes in $182 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 181.9% better value on MSRP (6.7 vs 2.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium SU4100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron T1600 vs Pentium SU4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T1600

The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium SU4100

The Pentium SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium SU4100 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1600 scores 715 against the Pentium SU4100's 685 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron T1600. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600 vs 0 kB on the Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Celeron T1600	Pentium SU4100
Cores / Threads	—	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.66 GHz+28%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	—	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	715+4%	685

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron T1600	Pentium SU4100
Socket	PGA478	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron T1600 was priced at $107, while the Pentium SU4100 came in at $289. On launch pricing ($107 vs $289), Celeron T1600 was $182 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T1600 delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 2.4 pts/$ for the Pentium SU4100 — making the Celeron T1600 the 95.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron T1600	Pentium SU4100
MSRP	$107-63%	$289
Performance per Dollar	6.7+179%	2.4
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron T1600 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.