Celeron T3300
VS
Core 2 Duo T9400

Celeron T3300 vs Core 2 Duo T9400

VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3300 is positioned at rank 1038 and the Core 2 Duo T9400 is on rank 796, so the Core 2 Duo T9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300

#1025
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2510%
#1026
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2473%
#1027
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2270%
#1028
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2260%
#1029
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2239%
#1031
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2163%
#1032
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2074%
#1033
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2070%
#1034
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2015%
#1037
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
100%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1041
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
95%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9400

#784
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1198%
#785
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1180%
#786
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1084%
#787
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1079%
#788
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1069%
#790
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1032%
#791
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
990%
#792
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
988%
#793
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
962%
#796
Core 2 Duo T9400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron T3300 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron T3300Core 2 Duo T9400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron T3300Core 2 Duo T9400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3300 and Core 2 Duo T9400

Intel

Celeron T3300

The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9400

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3300 scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo T9400's 1,004 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron T3300. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3300 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9400.

FeatureCeleron T3300Core 2 Duo T9400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.53 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
1 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+500%
L2 Cache
6 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,005
1,004
Geekbench 6 Single
320
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureCeleron T3300Core 2 Duo T9400
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3300) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9400). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9400 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCeleron T3300Core 2 Duo T9400
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget