
Celeron T3300 vs Pentium E5400

Celeron T3300

Pentium E5400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3300 is positioned at rank 1038 and the Pentium E5400 is on rank 830, so the Pentium E5400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300
Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron T3300 | Pentium E5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron T3300 | Pentium E5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+226%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3300 and Pentium E5400

Celeron T3300
The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5400
The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.
Processing Power
The Pentium E5400 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3300 scores 1,005 against the Pentium E5400's 1,007 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium E5400. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3300 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5400.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Pentium E5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | — | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,005 | 1,007 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T3300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Pentium E5400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Celeron T3300 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium E5400 debuted at $55. At current prices ($15 vs $49), the Celeron T3300 is $34 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3300 delivers 67.0 pts/$ vs 20.6 pts/$ for the Pentium E5400 — making the Celeron T3300 the 106.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron T3300 | Pentium E5400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $55-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 67.0+225% | 20.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











