Celeron T3500
VS
Athlon II X2 220

Celeron T3500 vs Athlon II X2 220

VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 220

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3500 is positioned at rank 1015 and the Athlon II X2 220 is on rank 561, so the Athlon II X2 220 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3500

#1003
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2224%
#1004
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2192%
#1005
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2012%
#1006
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2003%
#1007
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1985%
#1009
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1917%
#1010
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1838%
#1011
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1835%
#1012
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1785%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
99%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
96%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
95%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
94%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 220

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9535%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9010%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6542%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1971%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1561%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1366%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
782%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
772%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
703%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
703%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
695%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
676%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
667%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
664%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
658%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
100%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
100%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
100%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
100%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
99%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
98%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
98%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
98%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
98%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
98%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
98%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
97%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X2 220 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron T3500 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron T3500 stands out as the superior choice. It delivers superior performance at a comparable price point.
InsightCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3500 and Athlon II X2 220

Intel

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon II X2 220

The Athlon II X2 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $32.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 220 is built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the Athlon II X2 220's 1,046 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron T3500. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 220.

FeatureCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
1 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,055
1,046
Geekbench 6 Single
285
Geekbench 6 Multi
500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T3500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 220 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
Socket
PGA478
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3500) / true (Athlon II X2 220). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 220 rivals Pentium E5500.

FeatureCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron T3500 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 220 debuted at $32. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Athlon II X2 220 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3500 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 104.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 220 — making the Celeron T3500 the 0.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron T3500Athlon II X2 220
MSRP
$80
$32-60%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
105.5
104.6
Release Date
2010
2010