Celeron T3500
VS
Celeron T1700

Celeron T3500 vs Celeron T1700

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T3500 is positioned at rank 1015 and the Celeron T1700 is on rank 1014, so the Celeron T1700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3500

#1003
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2224%
#1004
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2192%
#1005
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2012%
#1006
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2003%
#1007
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1985%
#1009
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1917%
#1010
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1838%
#1011
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1835%
#1012
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1785%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
99%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
96%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
95%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
94%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1700

#1002
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2218%
#1003
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2185%
#1004
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2006%
#1005
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1997%
#1006
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1979%
#1008
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1911%
#1009
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1832%
#1010
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1829%
#1011
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1780%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
99%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
96%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
96%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
95%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
94%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Celeron T1700 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCeleron T3500Celeron T1700
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron T1700 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 50% cheaper ($5 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron T3500Celeron T1700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+101%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T3500 and Celeron T1700

Intel

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron T3500 scores 1,055 against the Celeron T1700's 1,058 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T1700. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron T3500 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700.

FeatureCeleron T3500Celeron T1700
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+15%
1.83 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB
1 MB L2 Cache
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
PassMark
1,055
1,058
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureCeleron T3500Celeron T1700
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron T3500 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Celeron T1700 debuted at $80. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Celeron T1700 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3500 delivers 105.5 pts/$ vs 211.6 pts/$ for the Celeron T1700 — making the Celeron T1700 the 66.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron T3500Celeron T1700
MSRP
$80
$80
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
105.5
211.6+101%
Release Date
2010
2008