CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo E6320
Athlon II X2 245
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6320 is positioned at rank 1051 and the Athlon II X2 245 is on rank 862, so the Athlon II X2 245 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6320
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 245
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+195%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon II X2 245
Core 2 Duo E6320
The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.
Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon II X2 245 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 — a 43.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6320 scores 1,115 against the Athlon II X2 245's 1,134 — a 1.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 245. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.86 GHz | 2.9 GHz+56% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | 2.9 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,134+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 — the Athlon II X2 245 supports 22.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 245) — the Core 2 Duo E6320 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6320) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | 1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+; Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E6320 launched at $163 MSRP, while the Athlon II X2 245 debuted at $66. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Core 2 Duo E6320 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6320 delivers 223.0 pts/$ vs 75.6 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 245 — making the Core 2 Duo E6320 the 98.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $163 | $66-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-67% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 223.0+195% | 75.6 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon II X2 245
