Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E2-3800

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E2-3800 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E6320

2 / 2

1,115

0.0%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,136

+1.9%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E2-3800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E2-3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E6320

2007

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike E2-3800.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,115 vs 1,136).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while E2-3800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

E2-3800

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8280, while Core 2 Duo E6320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6320.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-3800 better than Core 2 Duo E6320?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6320 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-3800 pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-3800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-3800 is the better buy right now. E2-3800 comes in $63 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $163 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E6320 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 66.1% better value on MSRP (11.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E6320 vs E2-3800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6320

The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E6320 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-3800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 — a 35.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6320. The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-3800 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6320 scores 1,115 against the E2-3800's 1,136 — a 1.9% lead for the E2-3800.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6320	E2-3800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.86 GHz+43%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2048 kB
Process	65 nm	28 nm-57%
Architecture	Conroe (2006−2007)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,115	1,136+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	136
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	389

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-3800 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus DDR3-1600 on the E2-3800 — the E2-3800 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs 1 (E2-3800). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs 4 (E2-3800) — the Core 2 Duo E6320 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6320) and SoC (E2-3800).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6320	E2-3800
Socket	LGA775	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs Yes (E2-3800). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6320	E2-3800
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Radeon HD 8280
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E6320 was priced at $163, while the E2-3800 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($163 vs $100), E2-3800 was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6320 delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the E2-3800 — making the E2-3800 the 49.7% better value option.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6320	E2-3800
MSRP	$163	$100-39%
Performance per Dollar	6.8	11.4+68%
Release Date	2007	2013

Search Core 2 Duo E6320 on Amazon

Search E2-3800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.