CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo E6320
E2-3800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6320 is positioned at rank 1051 and the E2-3800 is on rank 1047, so the E2-3800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6320
Performance Per Dollar E2-3800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+293%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6320 and E2-3800
Core 2 Duo E6320
The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.
E2-3800
The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E6320 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-3800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 — a 35.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6320. The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-3800 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6320 scores 1,115 against the E2-3800's 1,136 — a 1.9% lead for the E2-3800.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.86 GHz+43% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2048 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Kabini (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,136+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 136 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 389 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E6320 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-3800 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 versus DDR3-1600 on the E2-3800 — the Core 2 Duo E6320 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs 1 (E2-3800). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs 4 (E2-3800) — the Core 2 Duo E6320 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6320) and SoC (E2-3800).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | FT3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+35433% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6320) vs Yes (E2-3800). The E2-3800 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8280), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon HD 8280 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E6320 launched at $163 MSRP, while the E2-3800 debuted at $100. At current prices ($5 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo E6320 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6320 delivers 223.0 pts/$ vs 56.8 pts/$ for the E2-3800 — making the Core 2 Duo E6320 the 118.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6320 | E2-3800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $163 | $100-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-75% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 223.0+293% | 56.8 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E6320 and E2-3800
