PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $163 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Core 2 Duo E6320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,112 vs 1,115).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6320.

Core 2 Duo E6320

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N3350.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.8 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($163 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3350 better than Core 2 Duo E6320?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N3350 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E6320 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E6320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3350 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3350 comes in $56 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $163 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E6320 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 51.9% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 6.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Core 2 Duo E6320

The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E6320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Core 2 Duo E6320's 1,115 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6320. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E6320
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+29%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.86 GHz+69%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,112	1,115
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — the Celeron N3350 supports 125.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6320 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3350) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6320) — the Core 2 Duo E6320 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3350) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6320).

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E6320
Socket	FCBGA1296	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400+125%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	16+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6320). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120; Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E6320
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 500	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	true
Target Use	Entry Level Laptop/NUC	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N3350 was priced at $107, while the Core 2 Duo E6320 came in at $163. On launch pricing ($107 vs $163), Celeron N3350 was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6320 — making the Celeron N3350 the 41.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP	$107-34%	$163
Performance per Dollar	10.4+53%	6.8
Release Date	2016	2007

Search Celeron N3350 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E6320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.